![jre spotify jre spotify](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JtducgG0ccQ/maxresdefault.jpg)
The book publisher or a TV network has internal processes, checks, and balances on content and content creators.
![jre spotify jre spotify](https://user-uploads.mixedmartialarts.com/optimized/3X/4/0/40ee7152d185fc69ebd02956dfa667ee8f1de98a_2_1024x562.jpeg)
That’s like a top TV network inviting a star anchor to host a show on their channel.
![jre spotify jre spotify](https://hornrimmercom.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/pexels-photo-374912.jpeg)
That’s like a mainstream book publisher paying top dollar to a writer and inviting him/her to write a book that can be published by them. That’s not like you and me opening a Facebook account and saying what we want in the name of free expression. Spotify wooed Joe Rogan, paid him US $100 million to gain the privilege of hosting on their platform. The person who caused the problem for Spotify is not a random online character who had a simple podcast hosted freely on Spotify. Unfortunately, the controversy Spotify finds itself in is not at all like what a Facebook or a Twitter or a YouTube face so very frequently. He skirted around the topic and like a really well-trained CXO spokesperson, avoided talking about why he was forced to address the world and bridged it towards a Facebook-style note on ‘expression’. I believe we have two responsibilities: to remove content when it could cause real danger as effectively as we can, and to fight to uphold as wide a definition of freedom of expression as possible - and not allow the definition of what is considered dangerous to expand beyond what is absolutely necessary.”īut Ek did not mention the person at the center of the controversy at all – Joe Rogan. Zuckerberg has used similar words very often, and so have many other Facebook spokespersons.Ĭonsider Zuckerberg’s speech at Georgetown University in 2019: “I’m here today because I believe we must continue to stand for free expression. In that role, it is important to me that we don’t take on the position of being content censor while also making sure that there are rules in place and consequences for those who violate them.” We know we have a critical role to play in supporting creator expression while balancing it with the safety of our users. So, given that the process is largely like uploading content on social media platforms, Spotify CEO Daniel Ek’s initial response ( shared on the company blog) to the Joe Rogan controversy sounded very much like how a Mark Zuckerberg or Jack Dorsey talks when confronted on uncomfortable issues around content moderation.Įk said, “Personally, there are plenty of individuals and views on Spotify that I disagree with strongly. It takes a few hours for the Spotify team to add you as a podcast host on Spotify, unlike the instant upload offered by say, YouTube. The process is explained in excruciating detail here. It’s just like uploading a video on YouTube – just that, instead of actually hosting your audio content the way you upload your video content to YouTube, you’d essentially be only giving an RSS feed link to Spotify. To be sure, anyone can host a podcast on Spotify.